Cultural Considerations Essay

People be to dissimilar cultures c all in all for diametrical lore towards the aspects of smell and judge is alike under these aspects that stick signifi privyt impact of culture. Individuals belong to particular cultures have their opinion about the arbitrator that is greatly influenced by the type of culture they belong to as every culture has close to ethics and values that each individual and order of magnitude follows. The concept of globalization has make great deal to live in diverse countries with different umpire system and this leads to the issue of cross pagan disparity in perception of rightness of different systems. So the culture values play a significant role in perceptions of justice and outcomes along with the comparison exercise (Bond, 1982).Since the people associated with certain cultures have their own tenets and these beliefs of individuals belonging to different cultures contradicts them with the justices and regulations of a particular count ry. Some cultural facets negate or mitigate guilty responsibility where acts are committed under a reasonable good-faith belief in their propriety, based on the individuals cultural heritage or tradition and this makes the people of particular culture to disagree with justice formulation of culture. The dissatisfaction of people from the justice system of the country escorts practical problems of the law and culture clash in the context of criminal and to some spirit level to civil liabilities to a fault.These differences also cause variety of cases including homicide, the treatment of children, animals and the dead as well as the regulation of marriage, attire, and drug usage cases to rise to a greater extent thus making it difficult for the security disposition to enforce proper law and request (Bond, 1982). The ethics and values of a particular culture impose serious problems for the security administrations also as people commit crimes and associate their sins particularly with criminal defenses, civil rights, and cultural regulations. So it became very difficult for the administration to regulate the country with different cultures as people take the shelter of their respective cultures in order to avoid serious punishments. This also makes the whole system reluctant of dreadful the better regime along with the law-culture clash that raises questions of hegemonic domination, human rights and political philosophy in the whole country.It is very difficult for the administration to maintain the justice right for all the individuals believing in different cultures as they have dissimilar issues so the g everywherenments of countries with mixed cultures have adopted services that can solve the law-culture issues. One of the most commonly followed policies is the Community Relation receipts as it appropriates platform to solve various issues based on race, emblazon or culture. The countries have adopted qualitative dimensions with respect to justice i n order to gather community perspectives at each stage of the justice process, while a quantitative dimension provides the opportunity to demonstrate outcomes that have credibility for community members and scholars also. Transformative mixed methodologies are also used by modern day systems to provide a mechanism for addressing the complexities of system coordination in culturally complex settings that can provide a basis for companionable stability (Kymlicka, 1995).Countries also use other methods like change in demographics and immigrant patterns to avoid clashes and these countries also set values under the justification and made immigrants alert of their laws in order to make every one aware of the law and regulation configuration (Kymlicka, 1995). These policies help the justice administration to tack their decisions in the perfect manner so that the law and order of the society is maintained without any sort of fuss among the masses. The security administration also provid es better policing facilities to provide enhanced level of security among the common people and avoid incidents that can lead to violence.The factors leading to the crime are also considered by most of the systems so that convicted individual is awarded punishment by considering all the parameters. These policies and methods provide a better coordination between the administration and the people belonging to different cultures by considering the issues and beliefs of particular culture and judging the individuals accordingly to provide most levelheaded and well composed justice.In 1829, Sir Robert Peel created the metropolitan Police when he served as Home Secretary of England. According to Peel, the received key for policing is the natural law are the people and the people are the police. His principles can still be used in the present geological era as the prevention of crime should be the main idea in order to maintain a peaceful environment all over the state. The public appr oval could also be used like his principles as in case of diverse society, it is necessary for police to understand the different cultures that make up the communities that they patrol. This can be accomplished through multi-cultural preparedness and education so that there is no problem in tackling the issues that obscure people from different cultural background.