'Traditional Gender Views and the Exceptions\r'

'Gender is an accompani handstor of an soulfulness’s being that permeates all aspects of his or her life. From the trice a person is born into the world, he or she is classified either as a egg-producing(prenominal) or a antheral. The way caller treats and reacts to this person is so treated accordingly to that initial categorization. What is it and so that epitomizes the masculinity and the femininity of an individual. How does Ameri stub society view a effeminate individual and how does this differ from how the same society views male individuals?\r\nMasculinity refers to a human’s personal level or stop of manliness. Chafetz (35-36) describes masculinity as being distributed everywhere seven atomic number 18as: physical, functional, sexual, emotional, emotional, intellectual, interpersonal, other personal characteristics.\r\nA masculine individual is said to be virile, strong, subject to provide for his family, sexually in-your-face and experienced, unemotional, practical, dominating, free, demanding, and success-oriented. Thus an individual who is more(prenominal) able to take risks and who is better able to break a sense of confidence and liberty is considered to be more masculine. Physical attributes much(prenominal) as facial hair, toned muscles, and bear-sized body frames ar excessively more characteristic of individuals who ar considered to be masculine.\r\nFemininity, on the other hand, is directly linked by the 1996 Websters Encyclopedic full-length Dictionary of the position Language to traits  much(prenominal) as gentleness, kindness, and patience (708). Feminine characteristics ar usually associated with nurturing and invigorating characteristics. The adult female’s handed-down character reference as a mother and wife argon the most emphasized qualities of a feminine individual. Thus a female who is demure, obedient, and able to display physical attributes that are favored in the life-giv ing process, such as large breasts, wide hips, and bounteous lips, is considered to be more feminine than most.\r\nStudies stir shown that a man’s traditional view of a female or feminine individual is based heavily on masculine ideology, which focuses centrally on the sexual aspect of a woman’s breasts and bodies. The propagation of these masculine ideologies were even more stressed by the fact that media continues to portray females as beings whose primarily roles are focused on their sexual bodies. (Ward et al, 712)\r\nmany can see, however, that the barriers of traditional gender roles are being broken by groundbreaking American males and females. More and more females are found in the workplace, becoming the breadwinners for their family. Females are also seen engaging in utmost(a) and traditional sports. Women’s roles in American society were seen to drastically change in the late twentieth century as a result of the new opportunities given up to the m (Mackey & Immerman, 271)\r\nThere are also men who have opted to become the stay-at-home parents. It is has become more acceptable for men to show their emotions. And a new spread over of men have come to be called metrosexuals, males who indulge in their physical sort in the same way that was antecedently only attributed to feminine individuals. The breaking of stereotypes of masculinity and femininity has become rampant in the United States and this may well bear to be the beginning of the end of the eclipse o traditional views of masculinity and femininity in American society. Even though sex and gender are net categorical divisions established upon birth, the long-established ramifications of being male or female and the parameters that these traditions set can be overcome.\r\nWorks Cited\r\nChafetz, Janet S. Masculine/feminine or human?:an overview of the sociology of sex roles. IL: F.E. Peacock Publishers, 1974\r\nâ€Å"Femininity” Websters Encyclopedic Unabr idged Dictionary of the English Language. 1996.\r\nMackey, Wade, C., & Immerman, Ronald S â€Å"The stinkiness paradox: gender roles, fertility and cultural evolution” Mankind quarterly 45(2005):271-\r\nWard, Monique L., Merriwether, Ann, & Caruthers, Allison. â€Å"Breasts are for men: media, masculinity ideologies, and men’s beliefs about women’s bodies.” Sex Roles 55(2006): 703-714\r\n'