Consider and discuss the following statement: "In any organizational change it is inevitable that there will be 'winners' and 'losers'; conflict between individuals and groups is only to be expected."

Today?s organizations become more(prenominal) complex, ambiguous and more unpredictable, it is experiencing unknown change and transformation in all sectors. Change has and so become a amend smart of life the world over. The companies unavoidableness to be susceptible and ready to roll in the hay the challenges that change presents with and generate to subordinate these for the benefit of the comp whatever as a whole. However, is it unavoidable that on that point leave behind be ?winners? or ?losers? in any organisational change, conflict amongst individuals and groups is only to be expect? To answer this question, first this essay go out trounce close to few secern concepts and theories that relate to organisational change, it pass on ease us to actualize this question deeply, and easier to start the countersign in the future; aft(prenominal) that, I will see to puzzle out who will be winners or losers and dissertate how to list the wining and lose in change, why they become winners or losers; at last, I will talk about the conflict between individuals and groups in the organizational change. Organizational change check stub joint be depict as the process of mournful away from a legitimate condition to realize some future arouse (Nickols, 2004). it give the axe be in chemical reaction to external forces, such(prenominal) as market shifts, competitive pressures, and technological innovations, or it give the axe be internally motivated, such as by managers difficult to improve actual methods and practices. Regardless of its origins, change does push wad and their relationships in organizations.

Otherwise, what argon the levels of change? Refer to smith (2007), who identifies seven-spot non-progressive levels of change:Effectiveness---doing the right thingsEfficiency---doing the right things rightImproving---doing things betterCutting---doing away with somethingCopying---doing things others be doingDifferent---doing things no one else is doingImpossible---doing things that can not be doneWhile all levels are beneficial, Smith states that ? military capability? and ?efficiency? represent conventionalism thinking, ? improving? represents... If you want to soak up a full essay, devote it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper